Vivian Jenkins Nelsen Helen Palmer Scott Marshall Lee Pao Xiong LWVMN Logo  
>Home >Ed Fund >Voting >Join Us >Member Resources
   

XML


© Copyright 2008 League of Women Voters of Minnesota.
All rights reserved.

AutoMark Questionnaire

Responses from Election Judges
Primary Election

Question/Response Tabulation Comments
1. Did you have to assist people to use the AutoMark?  If so, what kind of assistance did you provide?
yes 13 general directions, help with instructions, how to insert ballot, where buttons are, how use buttons, how to get started, what side arrows used for, had trouble with “Mark ballot button,” 
yes 2 minimal/limited
yes 1 only one due to paper jam
no 12  
2. Did anyone turn down using the AutoMark and ask for assistance?
no 21  
no 1 offered to only one person who accepted
blank 3  
yes 2  
n/a 1 no one used it
3. How much time did it take voters to vote?
15 min 1  
10 min 3  
7 min 1  
5 min 6  
2 to 3 extra min 5  
1 to 3 min 2  
longer than a paper ballot 3  
no one used it 4  
4. What was the general response from voters about the machine?
positive 12
  • liked it, easy to use, good
  • people thought it was great, fun
  3
  • nice but didn’t need it
  • nice but old way better
  • curious
n/a 1 varied from lousy to slow, most didn’t want to use it, no privacy, too long
negative 4 too long
5. Did you receive sufficient training?
yes 27 xx
probably 1 xx
6. Did you have trouble with setting up or closing down?
no 25 xx
yes 1 No instructions how to remove memory card
yes 1 Some machines did not “boot up” correctly at first.  Had to turn off and on couple times.
yes 1 expected to have 2 CF cards, but had only one; was told later that only one was provided at service station
7. Were there any machine malfunctions?  If so, please describe.
no 19  
n/a 1  
yes 2 paper jam, fixed and it worked fine on 2nd try
yes 1 One machine would not accept ballots.  Replaced.
8. Are there other comments you’d like to share?
   
  • Voters who used enlarged print had trouble voting because only half screen showed up and they got confused.  With slant of the screen, voters would touch a name but get registered under another name.
  • voter said voice was sometimes difficult to understand
  • more women than men voted
  • will ink cartridge be OK for general election?
  • we should have turned it around for privacy
  • too large & heavy
  • thought hearing impaired voter was good candidate but they didn’t use it, was hard to identify who could benefit from it
  • people really liked it
  • can see that it is a big help & maybe could use more machines in their precinct
  • Encouraged voters to use
  • Costly for small township